M.F.Husain :THE HINDU HATER

MAQBOOL Fida Husain comes through as a sexually perverse person. To paint nudity is an old tradition. To portray sex play may be pornographic, but it is not unnatural and not considered perverse. However, to depict copulation between an animal and a woman is revolting to the normal person.
Think of a horse and woman, a bull and a woman, a lion and a woman, an elephant and a woman! The photographs of many of the paintings are printed in a volume entitled Husain. The book was conceived and designed by M.F.Husain himself.
An individual suffering from a mental disease is ultimately his personal concern. However, when the fall out of his perversity touches persons unknown to him, it is slanderous. When the pornography of the perversity embroils deities, it is sacrilegious.
Prime facie, Husain has insulted the Hindu ethos in general and believing Hindus in particular. Can he be forgiven for painting Durga and Saraswati naked? And Sita masturbating on the long tail of Hanuman; in another painting she is shown sitting naked on the thigh of Ravana. Imagine a bull copulating with Parvati and Shankar watching the act on Shivratri. On the other hand, Durga in union with her lion! The painting of Krishna with his flute sitting on a cow but with no feet and no hands.
How can so many instances be by inadvertence? Suppose Husain is allowed the benefit of doubt and a judgement is suspended for a while. Look at some of his other paintings, only to find that he painted Muslim women all fully dressed. His step mother Shirin. Prophet Mohammed’s daughter Fatima, Mother Teresa, also got the benefit of all her clothes, a privilege denied to Hindu deities.
On a panel painting, Husain has portrayed Einstein, Gandhi, Mao Zedong and Hitler, sitting in a row. The former three are dressed but the Nazi leader is naked. Does that not mean that he painted in the nude all those he hated? Hindu deities painted by Husain fall in the same category as Adolf Hitler, the killer of six million innocent Jews and thousands of others.
A few years back, he had dared to paint Bharat Mata nude. Can any self-respecting Hindu forgive Maqbool Fida Husain? It is matter of shame for all the Hindus, living in India or abroad should strongly protest him and should sent letters of protests to the Honb’le President of India to snatch brush from him and throw him behind the bars. Above all, he should be interrogated that at whose behest he is bent upon in doing these nefarious paintings or throw him out along with his supporters from India. If he or his supports say that unintentionally, all this happened where were his intentions for showing Fatima in full dress. Why she is not painted nude. Why Mohammed’s( peace be upon him) wives are painted nude so far? It’s clear a sign to instigate the Hindus, so that the Muslim fundamentalists may bake their share of loafs. Where have all the Muslim clergies, Imams, Maulvies, Human Right activists, Shabanas, Javed Akhtars, Dilip Kumars alias Yusuf Bhai and other pseudo-secularist leaders gone. Are they living on this earth, seeing all this nonsense?
More so, our Parliament can dare to overt and covet the courts’ decisions going against Muslims; could dare to call Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi with different names over the riots in Ahmadabad.See, one after the other is trying to cash the Gujarat riots but ignoring the root cause, e.g., burning of Ram bhakhts in Sabarmati train (our pseudo-secularist leaders say "the fire was an accident"), but why are they all become deaf, dumb and blind on Husain’s such nonsense paintings. It’s a matter of shame for every Hindu if he/she tolerates such non-sense paintings of their gods and goddesses to whom they worship, such painters should not allowed in live in this country for a moment. Any moment he could spark the riots then all will come forward beating their chests/breasts.
If Husain’s such paintings could be called an art then why the caricatures of Mohammed (Peace be upon him) by the Danish cartoonist be called objectionable? Is it not the double standard?
Over the demolition of the disputed structure at Ayodhya the world had reacted but in that reaction how many Hindu temples are broken, did any one of them asked the Muslims why they done so. If Ayodhya was a heinous act then to break and fire Hindu temples was a good deed. Did our government or any parliamentarian ask the Pakistan government to rebuild that broken Hindu temple made by Motilal Nehru.Almost every newspaper, that time had carried the photo of that broken temple?
In the end,it is better to say in this context that WOH KATAL BHI KARTE HAIN TO CHARCHA NAHIN HOTI, HUM AAH BHI BHARTE HAIN TO AFSANE BAN JAATE HAIN.